Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Associativity of new operators
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Julien Signoles <signoles@l...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Associativity of new operators

> The above toplevel session shows that the associativity of newly defined
> operators depends on the name of the operator itself. Is there a general rule to
> determine the associativity of the operator?

Section 6.7 of the manual, there is a table giving the associativity of
the operators (and other constructions):

Hope this helps,
-- ;
"In theory, practice and theory are the same,
but in practice they are different" (Larry McVoy)