Browse thread
Associativity of new operators
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Eric Cooper <ecc@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Associativity of new operators |
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +0100, Alessandro Baretta wrote: > [...] > The above toplevel session shows that the associativity of newly defined > operators depends on the name of the operator itself. Is there a general > rule to determine the associativity of the operator? Section 6.7 of the manual. Basically, it's determined by the initial character, so @^$ will have the same associativity as @. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u