On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Nathan Cooprider wrote:
> So I am still trying to get modules to be dynamically (run-time)
> selectable instead of only statically (compile-time).

You can't do that in OCaml. Why don't you use objects or records to hold
the functions, instead of modules?

There are other MLs where you can pack a module into some manipulable
entity, but OCaml isn't one of them. Once you go there I wonder why not
just remove all differences between modules and records, since the two
things seem very similar.

-- Brian