Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
async networking
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Remi Vanicat <remi.vanicat@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: async networking
2006/2/7, Bardur Arantsson <spam@scientician.net>:
> Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> > Yes, the default Equeue implementation bases simply on select(). It is,
> > however, possible to develop alternate implementations. Currently, there
> > are three of them which integrate into the event loops of labltk,
> > lablgtk1 and lablgtk2. One could, for example, easily add an
> > implementation for advanced kernel interfaces like epoll.
>
> Actually, it might be quite interesting to see one based on
> poll()/epoll(), but I suspect it wouldn't matter much compared to all
> the other stuff that's going in the Equeue code. This is just a very
> vague hunch, though.

I believe that labgtk (and so equeue over lablgtk) use poll. Note that
you are adding another layer : glib, so you might not have gain a lot.