On Feb 24, 2006, at 14:29, EEK Cooper wrote:

> Since the behavior was NOT unspecified, it was reasonable to assume  
> that the
> documentation suffered from a simple typo, and to expect the  
> behavior not to
> change.

"It is documented to do something else, so we will assume that it's  
intended
to do what it does, instead of what the documentation says."

I don't think this is very reasonable.

-- Damien