Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Stroustrup et al. propose to introduce "lambdaclosures" in C++
- Alexander Bottema
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-03-17 (14:13) |
From: | Alexander Bottema <Alexander.Bottema@m...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Stroustrup et al. propose to introduce "lambdaclosures" in C++ |
It is interesting to see that they are trying to implement closures in C++, something I wanted for a long time. Unfortunately, I don't think it is useful without having a proper garbage collector. If you read the specification (5.2) you can see it is something they struggle with. I think it is time that they added garbage collection to C++ as the default memory allocation strategy like all other high-level languages. If we could restrict the semantics of C++ on how we use pointers then we might be able to implement an efficient generational garbage collector (e.g. a three generation based collector as in Microsoft .NET). An alternative would be to use a conservative collector (such as Boehm), but then there are less chances to do garbage collection optimizations at compile-time. Alexander -----Original Message----- From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Eijiro Sumii Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 5:08 AM To: Caml List Cc: Eijiro Sumii Subject: [Caml-list] Stroustrup et al. propose to introduce "lambdaclosures" in C++ Hi, A friend of mine informed me of this report Lambda expressions and closures for C++ Jeremiah Willcock, Jaakko Jarvi, Doug Gregor, Bjarne Stroustrup, Andrew Lumsdaine 2006-02-26 http://public.research.att.com/~bs/N1968-lambda-expressions.pdf and I thought you might be interested. (I searched a little and didn't find any discussion on this report in this list.) A few highlights: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- We propose to extend the C++ language with lambda expressions, and define the semantics of these unnamed local functions via translation to closures: function objects implemented using local classes. ... void f() { int sum = 0; for each(a.begin(), a.end(), <>(int x) -> int extern(sum) {return sum += x;}); } ... 2.1 Omitting the return type The return type of a lambda expression can be omitted if the body of the lambda function contains at most one return statement. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enjoy:-), Eijiro _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs