Archives of the Caml mailing list > Message from Nicolas Pouillard

Browse thread

(int * int) <> int*int ?

Frédéric_Gava
- Thomas Fischbacher
- Eric Cooper
  - Frédéric_Gava
  - Martin Jambon
- David Brown
  - Frédéric_Gava
  - Frédéric_Gava
    - Frédéric_Gava
      - Jacques Garrigue
        
        Lukasz Stafiniak
        
        Jacques Garrigue
        
        Alain Frisch
        
        Vincent Balat
        
        Nicolas Pouillard
        
        Richard Jones
        
        Nicolas Pouillard
        
        Christophe TROESTLER
        
        Nicolas Pouillard
        
        Hendrik Tews
        
        Nicolas Cannasse
        
        Frédéric_Gava
  - Sebastian Egner
    - Thomas Fischbacher
- Jon Harrop
  - Frédéric_Gava

Date:	2006-03-01 (13:01)
From:	Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@i...>
Subject:	Re: [Caml-list] (int * int) <> int*int ?

On 2/26/06, Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@umh.ac.be> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, "Nicolas Pouillard" <nicolas.pouillard@inria.fr> wrote:
> >
> >  I'am working on a renovation of camlp4 as an internship).
>
> In view of the recent discussion, how about to bundle with camlp4 a
> curried syntax for constructors (independent of the revised syntax)
> and see if people prefer it?
>

Perhaps as a little extension.

--
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai