Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] STM support in OCaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-03-08 (11:56) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] STM support in OCaml |
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 12:32 +0100, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > Anyway, I think this question is misleading. The point is not to > establish locking schemes that use the hardware better (i.e. that are > faster), but to help programmers writing correct code. My aim would be to do both -- they're not independent. Who cares about concurrency if not to try to do some job faster? And of course it's no good if you do the wrong thing faster :) -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net> Async PL, Realtime software consultants Checkout Felix: http://felix.sourceforge.net