Browse thread
Stack_overflow
-
mulhern
- Jon Harrop
-
mulhern
- Ingo Bormuth
- Christophe TROESTLER
- Till Varoquaux
- Eric Cooper
- Stefan Monnier
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-04-01 (09:29) |
From: | Till Varoquaux <till.varoquaux@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Stack_overflow |
On 4/1/06, mulhern <mulhern@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks to everybody who responded. > > To clarify things: > I'm trying to _compile_ a list definition. > So, my .ml file looks like this: > > --- > let myList = [("first", ["some"; more]); > ("second", ["more"; "still"])] > --- > except that there are 12,000 elements in the list instead of two as in > the example. > _ocamlc_ throws a Stack_overflow error while compiling this list. So, > I want to know how to influence _ocamlc_ to be able to compile this or > larger lists. > > The suggestion of chunkifying the list into smaller lists is a > practical one; I may be forced to try it. > > ocamlc.opt compiles the list fine but that reduces portability. > > -mulhern Note that ocamlc.opt should produce exactly the same code than ocamlc.... The difference is that the compiler is natively compiled instead of byte-compiled. Therefor your program will run in as many places it just won't compile on plateforms without ocamlc.opt. You could put your list in a separate module, byte compile it and "include" it in the reste of your source. This *should* solve the problem (I might be wrong) and you could still bundle the rest of your sources in a way that would allow to compile them with ocamlc. Till