Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
compiler bug?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] compiler bug?
>> Well, there is the paper by George and Appel where they use an ILP
>> solver (integer linear programming) to produce optimal spills, but
>> that's kind of expensive...
>
> It is my impression that users of compilers are "ready" for the
> following situation:
> 1) an optimizing compiler (like ocamlopt!) that produces good code
> efficiently
> 2) a super-optimizing compiler that produces fantastic code, at whatever
> cost.

Clearly, you're not the guy who would have to support both compilers :-)
More seriously, I agree that optional "super-optimization" passes
could be useful in some cases.

Actually, George and Appel found that compilation times with their
approach were almost reasonable (e.g. a few minutes instead of a few
seconds for a standard compiler), but they had to use a commercial ILP
solver.  If only there were *really good* ILP and SAT solvers under free
licenses...

- Xavier Leroy