Browse thread
compiler bug?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Brown <caml-list2@d...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] compiler bug? |
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 03:31:26PM -0400, Jacques Carette wrote: > In Computer Algebra, people use Groebner bases all the time. They have > doubly-exponential worst-case complexity -- but seem to work rather well > in practice. So I have stopped paying attention to worst-case; average > case, when available, does matter a lot more. Except when someone made a decision like this, in say a revision control system, and suddenly you discover that you've provoked a worst case scenario, and it suddenly takes hundreds of cpu hours to check in a file rather than a few seconds. For something like a compiler, worse case behavior is very important. It is not generally acceptable for a build to just hang in the compiler. Dave