Browse thread
Array 4 MB size limit
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Nicolas Cannasse <ncannasse@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Array 4 MB size limit |
>>Also, the fact that using lists crashes for the same data set is >>surprising. Is there a similar hard limit for lists, or would this be a >>bug? Should I post a test case? > > > Depends on the platform you use. In principle, Caml should report > stack overflows cleanly, by throwing a Stack_overflow exception. > However, this is hard to do in native code as it depends a lot on the > processor and OS used. So, some combinations (e.g. x86/Linux) will > report stack overflows via an exception, and others will let the > kernel generate a segfault. A segfault will happen on Windows/MSVC port. I also found some cases where the commandline program (the haXe compiler in that case) just silently exited on Stack Overflow (exit code was not 0 but no error or "program error" infamous message box was displayed). I think that there is some MSVC specific C extension for catching such stack overflows (__try / __except*). It would be nice to have such a handling at the ocaml toplevel that would at least exit with a meaningful error message. I don't care so much in my case since I'm not using C code a lot, I know for sure that any crash/early abort is indeeed a stack overflow. That might not be the case for all Win32 users. Best, Nicolas * http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vccelng/htm/key_s-z_4.asp