Browse thread
compiler bug?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jacques Carette <carette@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] compiler bug? |
skaller wrote: >>>What about high level optimisations? >>> >>>Felix supports this: >>> >>> reduce revrev[t] (x:list[t]): rev (rev x) => x; >>> >>> >>Haskell (GHC to be precise) allows that too. But is syntactic >>term-rewriting, in other words it is *untyped*. >> >> > >It's well typed. x:list[t] means x is of type list[t]. > > The *result* is well-typed. What is the 'type' of the rule (ie the 'function' reduce) ? reduce acts on the programming language syntax, not on semantic values. Jacques