[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Chris King <colanderman@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Module type troubles |
On 7/18/06, Jean-Marie Gaillourdet <jm@gaillourdet.net> wrote: > As far as I understand ML modules, the only way to achieve that is to > capture your type variables with abstract types in separate modules, > i.e. Foo and Bar have to get their type parameters as modules. I was hoping to keep the functions polymorphic but it seems like functors like you say are the best route... they'll probably end up making my code cleaner anyway :P Thanks, Chris King