Browse thread
Weak hashtables & aggressive caching
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-08-14 (18:19) |
From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Weak hashtables & aggressive caching |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:28:39AM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: > Wait a minute, though. According to the Gdk reference manual, > <http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gdk/gdk-Pixbufs.html#id2861842> > > Pixbufs are client-side images. Ah right, pixbufs, pixmaps ... In that case why bother preloading them at all? eog is flagrant with regards to pixmaps because the developers believe it allows them to display images quickly (the images are already on the X server, converted from JPEGs into raw pixels). In this age of fast CPUs and slow RAM this is unlikely to be the case. Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com