[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-08-09 (22:51) |
From: | Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] format polymorphism & campl4 |
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006, Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> wrote: > > > 'a 'b. (string -> 'b, 'a, 'b) format > > It clearly has the second type! Thanks for answering -- I got badly confused by the error message ! (shame on me :) > > type 'a fmt = { fmt: 'b 'c. ('a,'b,'c) format } > > fun (s: _ fmt) -> Printf.printf s.fmt, Scanf.sscanf "string" s.fm > > With your definition of fmt, you are requiring 'c to be independent > from 'a. But If you look at the type of "%s", you see that > 'a = string -> 'c, so that {fmt="%s"} is not well-typed. Well, yes, of course, that's obvious after you stated it! :) > A solution is to define it as > type 'a fmt = {fmt: 'b 'c. ('a -> 'b, 'c, 'b) format} > > The drawback is that only allows formats taking one argument. > One could add definitions for any defined number of arguments, but I > don't see any generic solution. Yeah but I really want to allow as many arguments as the user desires. That's a bit of an annoyance for printf/scanf like schemes: you have to know in advance in how many contexts you may want to simultaneously use an argument of type format in order to put enough type parameters... So I suppose my best luck to do it cleanly is to use camlp4 to make the parameter duplication for the user. Another approach I was thinking about is to define a new type, say type ('a,'b,'c,'d) fmt and have (for the above application) external pr_fmt : (_, _, 'a, 'c) fmt -> ('a, out_channel, 'c) format = "%identity" external sc_fmt : ('a, 'c, _, _) fmt -> ('a, Scanf.Scanning.scanbuf, 'c) format = "%identity" external ( !/ ) : ('a, _, 'b) format -> ('a, 'b, 'a, _) fmt = "%identity" let f s = Printf.printf (pr_fmt s), Scanf.sscanf "string" (sc_fmt s) f !/"%s %u" Now, of course ( !/ ) is not completely doing what I want. If [pr_fmt] and [sc_fmt] are for purely internal use by the library -- thus user only seeing [/!] -- is the above safe? Is there a way using Camlp4 to reinterpret a string in the new type (possibly prefixing it with !/ or another chosen symbol to distinguish it) so that, say, !/"%i %f" becomes (Obj.magic "%i ... %f": (int -> float -> 'a, 'a, int -> float -> 'b, 'b) fmt) ? Thanks for your help, ChriS P.S. Out of curiosity, is there a type system with inference (say, extending the one of OCaml) that can handle this kind of thing cleanly?