Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Weak hashtables & aggressive caching
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Matt Gushee <matt@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Weak hashtables & aggressive caching
Richard Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:28:39AM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
>> Wait a minute, though. According to the Gdk reference manual, 
>> <http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gdk/gdk-Pixbufs.html#id2861842>
>>
>>   Pixbufs are client-side images.
> 
> Ah right, pixbufs, pixmaps ...  In that case why bother preloading
> them at all?

Well, maybe I shouldn't. That's why I asked if it was worth the effort.

> eog is flagrant with regards to pixmaps because the
> developers believe it allows them to display images quickly (the
> images are already on the X server, converted from JPEGs into raw
> pixels).  In this age of fast CPUs and slow RAM this is unlikely to be
> the case.

Thanks for your insights.

-- 
Matt Gushee
: Bantam - lightweight file manager : matt.gushee.net/software/bantam/ :
: RASCL's A Simple Configuration Language :     matt.gushee.net/rascl/ :