Browse thread
ocaml support in autotools
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ocaml support in autotools |
Christian Lindig wrote: > Having a ./configure is very convenient for developers and users alike. Agreed. > Hoever, it does not have to be generated from Autoconf. The OCaml > distribution uses manually written shell scripts, Yes, I am aware than I can write my own configure script but I would *much* rather user autoconf and automake if they both support Ocaml. I already use autoconf, automake and libtool for two C libraries. > I found it much easier to implement the checks that I need in my own > little Perl script rather than relying on Autotools. I have and will continue to write M4 macros for autoconf as required. Erik -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ Erik de Castro Lopo +-----------------------------------------------------------+ "Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea." -- Alexander Viro on linux-kernel mailing list