Browse thread
Weak hashtables & aggressive caching
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Weak hashtables & aggressive caching |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:58:29AM -0600, Matt Gushee wrote: > It seems to me it might be useful to implement an aggressive caching > strategy--i.e., since the files to be loaded are known in advance (from > the command line),[...] Please no! When running X remotely this will cause images to be transferred (uncompressed) over the network and stored inside the X server when they may not even be viewed. This sort of thing is already a serious problem with programs like 'eog', making them virtually unusable remotely. Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com