On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 09:08 +0200, Francis Dupont wrote:
>  In your previous mail you wrote:
> 
>    Clearly the Wikipedia definition of strict:
>    
>    	f(bottom) = bottom
>    
>    is rubbish when applied to a mathematical function like 'sin', 
>    since bottom isn't a valid argument, but it makes sense
>    for 'sin' in the programming language sense.
>    
> => as a student many years ago of the inventor of the "strictness" concept
> I don't understand your statement: 

well .. I'll simplify it then: "I'm confused" :)

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net