Browse thread
3.09.3 release candidate 1
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-09-13 (15:54) |
From: | Hendrik Tews <tews@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] 3.09.3 release candidate 2 |
> I do not understand why you do need .cmo files when you have a library > (gramlib.cma or camlp4.cma) that includes these modules (note that .a > and .cmxa are also available for native linking). But with this line of reasoning, plexer.{o,cmx} should not be installed either, shouln't it? because these are *camlp4* modules, camlp4 loads bytecode (only) dynamically from a single cmo file (only). No, for me it was like that: - first I didn't know, there is library with these modules (how to find out what library contains a given module without grepping through the build log?) - linking gramlib does not work, because the module is not explicitely referenced (only during runtime the program does a dynlink on something else that needs the given module) I could fix that with adding an artificial reference like module XXX = Plexer (I could still imagine some camlp4 application szenario, where you need to use -linkall, but don't want to link all of gramlib.cma. Then you would need the cmo itself, right? However, this was not the case in my application.) Bye, Hendrik