[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-09-04 (07:42) |
From: | Alain Frisch <Alain.Frisch@i...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Eliminating array bounds check |
Alain Frisch wrote: > What about making GenT a functor and passing it unnamed structures as > arguments? (Ok, you must then trust the client not to apply GenT with > named structures.) Actually, GenT should be a functor anyway, since the abstract types in the resulting structure must encode invariants which depends on the (length of the) array. Unfortunaly, you cannot make a polymorphic functor such as: module GenT(A : sig val a : 'a array end) ... As a work-around, you can take only the length of the array as an argument: module TrustedKernel(L: sig val len: int end) : sig type 'a barray type bindex val unbi : bindex -> int type bindexL type bindexH ... end = struct let brand a = assert(Array.length a = L.len); (a,0,L.len - 1) end On the one hand, this adds one run-time check, but on the other hand it makes the abstract index types depend only on the length (so the trusted kernel could be used in algorithms which work with several arrays of the same size simultaneously). -- Alain