Jakob Lichtenberg wrote:
> Is this a bug in ocamlopt?

No - rather, it is the ugly intrusion of reality. ;)

As has been already pointed out, it isn't easy to generate code that 
detects this at runtime under a widely varying set of environments and 
conditions... to tighten it up further would likely start costing in 
performance (and what is ocamlopt for?).

A related veiwpoint says that while you still don't understand your 
app's logic and control paths well enough to predict/avoid things like 
runaway stack usage - you use the interpreted version.  THEN you 
switch to the ocamlopt version when you think you are ready (and be 
prepared to switch back if you are proven wrong).

> On Wednesday 11 October 2006 19:46, Jakob Lichtenberg wrote:
>> When I compile the following program as byte code I see a stack
> overflow
>> (expected).  When using ocamlopt it seems that the program dies and I
> do
>> not see the expected overflow exception?
> 
> OCaml doesn't always throw the Stack_overflow exception from native
> code. On 
> some systems it seg faults.

Robert Roessler
roessler@rftp.com
http://www.rftp.com