[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] callback question |
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 05:08:48PM +0200, micha wrote: > I'm storing an ocaml object in a c++ class (the class calls methods of > the ocaml class). To do that I register the object as described for > callback functions in the manual and use it with caml_named_value. > It works perfect so it seems to be the right way. (?) > But does the gc ever remove the object (since it is registered as a > callback)? You don't need to post questions twice. Why don't you call Gc.compact () and see if the object gets freed? Rich. -- Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd. Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com Internet Marketing and AdWords courses - http://merjis.com/courses - NEW! Merjis blog - http://blog.merjis.com - NEW!