Browse thread
Functorized map: How to go from (polymorphic) map to set?
-
Martin Percossi
- Martin Jambon
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Martin Jambon <martin1977@l...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Functorized map: How to go from (polymorphic) map to set? |
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Martin Percossi wrote:
> Hello, I'm a bit of a newbie to ocaml - I've programmed more in haskell plus
> all the other "standard" languages (C, java, ...). I'm testing ocaml by
> writing a little language of my own. Unfortunately, I'm somewhat stuck with
> something that I know in haskell would be quite easy to code using type
> classes. Here is a minimal example:
>
> module type AbstractStringTable =
> sig
> type 'a table
> type 'a set
> (* Give me the set of entries, i.e. (string, value)
> pairs that are in the first table but not in the
> second, as a set *)
> val diff : 'a table -> 'a table -> 'a set
> end;;
> module StringTable : AbstractStringTable =
> struct
> module M = Map.Make(String)
> type 'a table = 'a M.t
> type 'a settype = string * 'a
> module IdTy : Set.OrderedType =
> struct
> type 'a t = 'a settype
^^^^
The problem is here: "type t" is expected, not "type 'a t".
> let compare (s1, _) (s2, _) = String.compare s1 s2
> end
> module S = Set.Make(IdTy)
> (* HERE'S THE PROBLEM! A SET WANTS A MONOMORPHIC TYPE!!! *)
> type 'a set = 'a S.t
> end;;
>
> And the compiler error I get is:
> File "problem.ml", line 22, characters 6-112:
> Signature mismatch:
> Modules do not match:
> sig
> type 'a t = 'a settype
> val compare : String.t * 'a -> String.t * 'b -> int
> end
> is not included in
> Set.OrderedType
> Type declarations do not match:
> type 'a t = 'a settype
> is not included in
> type t
>
> So basically the compiler doesn't like me trying to make the Set.t type
> polymorphic, as it is in Map.
If you look at the keys, in both cases they are monomorphic. So the
solution here is to implement your StringTable module as a functor which
takes the type of elements as argument.
Here's something that compiles:
module type AbstractStringTable =
sig
type table
type set
(* Give me the set of entries, i.e. (string, value)
pairs that are in the first table but not in the
second, as a set *)
val diff : table -> table -> set
end;;
module type Elt_type =
sig
type elt
end
module StringTable (E : Elt_type) : AbstractStringTable =
struct
open E
module M = Map.Make(String)
type table = elt M.t
type settype = string * elt
module IdTy : Set.OrderedType =
struct
type t = settype
let compare (s1, _) (s2, _) = String.compare s1 s2
end
module S = Set.Make(IdTy)
(* HERE'S THE PROBLEM! A SET WANTS A MONOMORPHIC TYPE!!! *)
type set = S.t
let diff = failwith "not implemented"
end;;
Martin
--
Martin Jambon, PhD
http://martin.jambon.free.fr