[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] record field access |
On Saturday 21 October 2006 04:53, j.romildo@gmail.com wrote:
> And to compare records with tuples, given also
>
> let dist3 (x1,y1) (x2,y2) =
> sqrt (sqr (x2 -. x1) +. sqr (y2 -. y1))
>
> what should be preferable: dist2 or dist3, regarding performance?
Specifically for all-float tuples and records, the internal representations
are different, with all-float records being unboxed. The performance
characteristics will be correspondingly different.
Otherwise, I don't know. I tried a lot of different combinations to try to
optimise my ray_sphere routine in the ray tracer. I got the impression that
it can affect register allocation, e.g. no CSE => pulling out {a.x=ax} in a
pattern requires an extra register but avoids repeated indirection (ax vs
a.x).
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists