Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Bytecode object files structure
- Xavier Clerc
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-11-15 (13:50) |
From: | Xavier Clerc <xcforum@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Bytecode object files structure |
Le 13 nov. 06 à 16:50, Pierre-Etienne Meunier a écrit : > Hello, > > I'd like to write an assembler, to be able to understand how the vm > really > works. I've to work on this for a school project (a compiler, I > want it to > output caml bytecode object files). If you are working on a compiler that should output files to be executed by the ocaml runtime, it does not seem necessary to handle cmo/cmi files as the format of bytecode file should be sufficient to code your compiler. Unless you have to link with ocaml modules. > I've understood that the data part, after the code itself, was > generated using > output_value (I didn't know this function before). This fonction is used by the Marshal module. It transforms any non- abstract value into a chain of bytes. The format of marshalling can be understood from the extern_rec function of the byterun/extern.c file. > What I don't get now are > the cu_reloc, cu_primitives and cu_imports fields of the > compilation_unit > type. You should remember that cmo files are parts that will be put together (linked) in order to create a bytecode file. Given this context : - cu_imports lists the name of imported (used) modules the current cmo should be linked with in order to produce a bytecode file (the digest of the imported modules is also kept to ensure that you link with the same version you compiled against) ; - cu_primitives lists the primitives declared by the current module (each 'external f : type1 -> type2 = "primitive" ' will result in a "primitive" entry of this list), needed to ensure that all required C primitives are provided ; - cu_reloc : as each module is compiled independently, it can declare some elements (e.g. global variables) and use them using a 0- based index ; thus, when you link several modules together, you have to relocate this information to ensure that the first module uses indexes from 0 to n, the second module uses indexes from n+1 to n+m and so on ... Hope this helps, Xavier Clerc PS : I am working on some documents describing marshalling format, bytecode files as well as instruction opcodes. I will hopefully release them before xmas but don't hold your breath as I don't have much spare time these days. In the meantime, you can contact me off-list for any related question. > > If you can help on this, > Thanks > P.E. Meunier > > On Monday 13 November 2006 11:53, you wrote: >> Hello, >> >> As I read a substancial part of the ocaml source code, I may help you >> understanding file formats. >> Could you be more precise about what you are particularly interested >> in : >> - file type : bytecode file, cmo file, cmi file ? >> - code or data section of these files ? >> >> May I also ask you what you are trying to do using these elements ? >> >> >> Cordially, >> >> Xavier Clerc >> >> Le 12 nov. 06 à 15:42, Pierre-Etienne Meunier a écrit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to decrypt .cmo files produced by simple programs, >>> such as >>> 1+1;; >>> or >>> print_string "string";; >>> or >>> List.length [1;2;3;4;5];; >>> >>> According to the source of Ocaml, there's something called the >>> "cmo_magic_number", systematically written at the beginning of >>> all .cmo >>> files. Does it have a real function for executing the programs, or >>> is it just >>> a way to make sure the file contains ocaml bytecode ? >>> >>> Then, there's the address of what seems to be the last bytecode >>> instruction. >>> Then, the bytecode instructions, as documented in opcodes.ml. >>> >>> After that, I can't understand anything : there vaguely seems to be >>> some >>> information related to linking or so... What is the precise >>> structure of this >>> part ? Is there some kind of a bytecode assembler ? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> P.E. Meunier (pierreetienne.meunier@ens-lyon.fr) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: >>> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list >>> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr >>> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners >>> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >