[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-11-27 (12:00) |
From: | Dmitry Bely <dmitry.bely@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] optimizing trivial functions |
On 11/26/06, Sean McLaughlin <seanmcl@cmu.edu> wrote: > > Will the Ocaml compiler optimize the following code to let y = ()? > > I'm designing a program that will depend heavily on whether this code > > is optimized in this way. > > > > let f x1 x2 ... x100 = () > > let y = f x1 ... x100 Yes, ocamlopt can do that. > To answer my own question, of course it can't do that, because the > arguments could have side effects. > > f (print_int 5) ... So what? The arguments will be evaluated but the function call will be optimized away. I guess you are trying to implement some debugging that can be switched off in the release version? If so, the following might be interesting for you: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2003/09/f2bf1cc8545d5e073638bd70d02b5056.en.html - Dmitry Bely