[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | NaN-NaN-NaN (NaN:NaN) |
| From: | Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Executable stacks in ocaml |
> I am one of the gentoo maintainers of ocaml and we had a couple of QA > reports saying that binaries produced by ocaml had the stack marked as > executable (I understand this is a problem for hardened systems as it > can cause security issues). > > Is there a way to tell ocaml to mark the stack as non-executable > or is it part of the compiler design and thus can't be changed? I wasn't familiar with this "executable stack" business, but a bit of searching led to this useful page at Gentoo which you might know already: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/gnu-stack.xml The brief answer is that no part of OCaml executes code located in the stack, especially not the assembly code generated by ocamlopt. The issue, if I understand correctly, is to inform the assembler and/or linker of this fact. The page above lists several approaches, all of which seem to be applicable to OCaml, but some need more patching than other. You're welcome to explore the options on your own and let us (caml@inria.fr) know of your conclusions. - Xavier Leroy