On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Philippe Wang wrote:
> (don't tell me about the alternative syntax, which is - to me - an
> "horror"...)

That would be a more interesting comment if you gave some reasons
as to why you believe that. I prefer the Revised syntax, for reasons
of overall consistency and because it removes a few gotchas, but for
various nontechnical reasons (tiny user community, questions about the
future of CamlP4 and the level of support for it, etc.) would not
switch over.

-- Brian