[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-11-27 (08:39) |
From: | Sean McLaughlin <seanmcl@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] optimizing trivial functions |
To answer my own question, of course it can't do that, because the arguments could have side effects. I wonder if Haskell would do this... Sean f (print_int 5) ... On Nov 21, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Sean McLaughlin wrote: > Hello, > > Will the Ocaml compiler optimize the following code to let y = ()? > I'm designing a program that will depend heavily on whether this code > is optimized in this way. > > let f x1 x2 ... x100 = () > let y = f x1 ... x100 > > Thanks, > > Sean > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >