Browse thread
Scripting in ocaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-12-23 (21:50) |
From: | Tom <tom.primozic@g...> |
Subject: | Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml) |
> > > > And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an > > authoritative source to support your claims ? > > > > Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is > > worth not using it. > > Yeah, terminology sucks. Let's abandon all terminology. Why so? Why not rather define it, so that it is definite and absolute once and for all. Then we become that authoritative source... :P - Tom