English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Scripting in ocaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2006-12-23 (21:50)
From: Tom <tom.primozic@g...>
Subject: Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml)
> > And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an
> > authoritative source to support your claims ?
> >
> > Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is
> > worth not using it.
> Yeah, terminology sucks.  Let's abandon all terminology.

Why so? Why not rather define it, so that it is definite and absolute once
and for all. Then we become that authoritative source... :P

- Tom