Browse thread
Scripting in ocaml
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml) |
Le 22 déc. 06 à 20:42, skaller a écrit : > This is not my understanding of what safe means. I gave a definition and showed how the definition applies to ocaml, if you don't want to use that term for that then call it 'zorglub', that suits me, it is just a property. So ocaml is a zorglub programming language. Le 22 déc. 06 à 21:14, Chad Perrin a écrit : > In point of fact, there is a clear definition. And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an authoritative source to support your claims ? Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is worth not using it. Daniel