Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Scripting in ocaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...>
Subject: Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml)

Le 22 déc. 06 à 20:42, skaller a écrit :

> This is not my understanding of what safe means.

I gave a definition and showed how the definition applies to ocaml,  
if you don't want to use that term for that then call it 'zorglub',  
that suits me, it is just a property. So ocaml is a zorglub  
programming language.


Le 22 déc. 06 à 21:14, Chad Perrin a écrit :

> In point of fact, there is a clear definition.

And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an  
authoritative source to support your claims ?

Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is  
worth not using it.

Daniel