Browse thread
A Question About Types and Inlining
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2006-12-09 (00:55) |
From: | Eric Cooper <ecc@c...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] A Question About Types and Inlining |
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 03:13:40PM -0800, Jim Grundy wrote: > [...] > The signatures of these modules currently contain lines like this: > type variable (* = int *) > [...] > 1/ Is there some way I can reveal this representation to the parts of > the system that clearly need it for effective optimization, without > opening this up for general use. You can use type variable = Variable of int etc. in your signatures. This makes the representation visible for optimization purposes, incurs no representation overhead, but will catch most typing mistakes. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u