On Thursday 21 December 2006 22:19, Chad Perrin wrote:
> So, basically, by "strict typing" you mean something like both
> compile-time and runtime type checking?  If it was *only* runtime type
> checking, you'd just be using a dynamic type system (the opposite of
> static typing, basically).

As many Lisp compilers try to do type inference and check types at run-time 
(giving warnings), Lisp is not dynamically typed according to your argument. 
Moreover, this is a property of the implementation and not of the language.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists