Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Scripting in ocaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Chad Perrin <perrin@a...>
Subject: Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml)
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 10:50:35PM +0100, Tom wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an
> >> authoritative source to support your claims ?
> >>
> >> Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is
> >> worth not using it.
> >
> >Yeah, terminology sucks.  Let's abandon all terminology.
> 
> 
> Why so? Why not rather define it, so that it is definite and absolute once
> and for all. Then we become that authoritative source... :P

My statement was meant to be sarcastic.

-- 
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
"There comes a time in the history of any project when it becomes necessary
to shoot the engineers and begin production." - MacUser, November 1990