On 1/24/07, Ingo Bormuth <ibormuth@efil.de> wrote:
> On 2007-01-22 21:54, Denis Bueno wrote:
> > I found some > 6 year old threads on this list
> > (http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2000/07/5a1aa1b9873679a2bf87fce5c55f342f.en.html)
> > having to do with the fact that you couldn't get backtraces on caught
> > exceptions without using camlp4.
> > Is this still the case?
>
> Taken from the latest Caml Weekly News, for the week of January 16 to 23, 2007 :
>
> >> ========================================================================
> >> 8) native-code stack backtraces
> >> Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/fa.caml/browse_frm/thread/
> >> cdd54b032895c17f/9af1209426f60400#9af1209426f60400>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ** Xavier Leroy said:
[snip long post]

I did see that, but, since I'm compiling into bytecode (which,
granted, I did not specify), I didn't think it applied to me. In any
event, it doesn't specify how exactly to *get* backtraces (apart from
OCAMLPARAM="b") at all.

Is there a way?

-Denis