On Monday 15 January 2007 00:19, you wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 08:49:56PM +0000, Jon Harrop wrote:
> > I've been considering commercialising the replacement OCaml stdlib that I
> > developed.
>
> That won't help to make OCaml a mainstream language.
> The ones which are going to buy this, if there's anyone, will have a
> different code than the one that are not going to buy it.

The most important changes are compatible with OCaml's stdlib. I've just made 
it faster and more robust.

> it just balkenized a bit more the situation.

I see no alternative.

> It's not really complex to have a replacement stdlib anyway, everybody
> can do it, and a lots of people have already put some freely-available
> on the internet.

Depends what features you want.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists