On Sunday 14 January 2007 18:51, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> At the moment, every one seems to have their own standard libraries to
> extends the deficiency/problems/lacks of the common one, and also a bunch a
> syntax extensions, that are also incompatible/redundant with each other for
> most of them.

I've been considering commercialising the replacement OCaml stdlib that I 
developed. Are you still using it? Would anyone else be interested?

Lots can be done to improve upon the reliability and performance of OCaml's 
stdlib...

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
Objective CAML for Scientists
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists