Browse thread
Ocaml compiler features
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | tab@s... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml compiler features |
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:33:26AM -0600, Edgar Friendly wrote:
> I will agree that I am too eager to "fix" the compiler, and appreciate
> the community's help in tempering my inexperience. But I'd like to help
> ocaml become a better language, and this seems like a reasonable small
> step to start on.
Although I disagree with this first step, I think OCaml need a hand in
becoming more mainstream. unfortunately, it seems that INRIA is not really
interested in making this happened, maybe tweaking syntax and extending the
libraries [1].
At the moment, every one seems to have their own standard libraries to extends
the deficiency/problems/lacks of the common one, and also a bunch a
syntax extensions, that are also incompatible/redundant with each other
for most of them.
[1] I would certainly prefer to be dead wrong here, but at the moment
I'm conforted in this idea.
Cheers,
--
Vincent Hanquez