Le 16 févr. 07 à 20:19, Matthieu Dubuget a écrit :

> At the first place, except the fact that I misused the macros, I still
> do not understand why CAMLreturn(0.05) would return 0.?

Because CAMLreturn assumes its parameter is a value of the C type  
'value' which represent a value of the ocaml runtime system and can  
be either (from the doc) :

> an unboxed integer;
> a pointer to a block inside the heap (such as the blocks allocated  
> through one of the caml_alloc_* functions below);
> a pointer to an object outside the heap (e.g., a pointer to a block  
> allocated by malloc, or to a C variable).

Its something the caml runtime wants not your C code. On a 32 bit  
platform the type 'value' is a 32 bit integer so when your return  
your double with CAMLreturn it is cast to a 32 bit integer [1] and  
then after that cast again to a double. Hence you lose the fractional  
part. It doesn't make sense to use CAMLreturn with anything but a  
caml value.

Best,

Daniel

[1] Have a look at the definition of CAMLreturn in <caml/memory.h>.