Browse thread
empty type
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] empty type |
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:47:38AM -0500, Fernando Alegre wrote: > > Hi, > > I think this is a bug, but I'm not sure. I mistakenly defined type e using > Haskell notation, and it was accepted. However, it shadowed the unit type. > Can someone confirm whether this should be acceptable or not? It tripped us up before: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2005/06/e1a4be2ebe9ced1cbdc06979a7e8ae17.en.html Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat UK Limited