Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Feature request : Tuples vs. records
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Frederic GAVA <frederic.gava@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Feature request : Tuples vs. records |
Hi David,
Another difference is that (If I remember) record of float are unboxed and not tuple of float. But perhaps it could be done.
Also, I do understand the true difference between write
{x=1;y=2} (9 caracters) and (~x:1,~y:2) (11 caracters) except syntaxic one (I thinks that = is simpler that : which is more for type)
Frédéric Gava
> I envision something like
> # (1,2);;
> - : int * int = (1, 2)
>
> # let pair_2 = (~x:1, ~y:2);;
> pair_2 : x:int * y:int = (1, 2)
>
> # let pair_3 = (~y:2, ~x:1);;
> pair_3 : y:int * x:int = (2, 1) (*or perhaps normalisation, say based
> on the lexicographical order of labels*)
>
> # pair_2 = pair_3;; (*structural equality*)
> true
>
> # match pair_2 with (~y:y, ~x:x) -> (x,y);;
> - : int * int = (1, 2)
>
>
> Is anything such considered ?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>