[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Robert Roessler <roessler@r...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] marshal and C structures crash |
Andres Varon wrote: > ... > For those of you who reached this line of my email, thanks for the > effort! I will listen at any ideas that could pop up in your minds. Hey, I will read the full message just to see what someone is doing with 70K lines of OCaml code! :) The usual comment - you don't mention any version and platform details... especially with something that took as long as this probably did, those might be of interest (particularly since some teams doing a project of this size might have not been keeping up with OCaml releases). It is not crystal clear that you are using "finalize" routines - if so, they are an obvious (and easy) place to position check code. If not, why not? It sounds like you might *need* to wrap some of your values created in C-land in smart-but-thin OCaml objects, if for nothing else than to more delicately handle lifetime issues. These "popped up" for me on my initial reading. ;) Robert Roessler roessler@rftp.com http://www.rftp.com