Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Operator overloading
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Robert Fischer <RFischer@R...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Operator overloading
I didn't realize that existed.  It's not so bad -- it lets me have my
cake and Jon eat it, too.  :D

~~ Robert.

-----Original Message-----
[]On Behalf Of Fernando Alegre
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:25 PM
To: Jon Harrop
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Operator overloading

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:40:42PM +0000, Jon Harrop wrote:

> For me, operator overloading is about clarity. In the absence of
> overloading, you cannot regain the lost clarity using modules and

I often use the poor man's local operator overloading already built into
the core OCaml:

let result =
    let (+) = Vector.add and ( * ) (x:int) (v:Vector.t) =
Vector.scalarmul x v
    in 3 * a + 2 * b

This makes overloading local and explicit, and at the same time makes
expressions clear. I do not miss implicit overloading.


Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
Beginner's list:
Bug reports: