Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-03-09 (10:34) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Interactive technical computing |
On Thursday 08 March 2007 21:26, Robert Fischer wrote: > > Putting aside the obvious cultural resistance to using a sensible > > language for this project, there is one technical hurdle: It needs to > > compile into a DLL which can be linked to other programs (in C and > > other languages). I can't generate such code using ocamlopt, at least > > not without using unsupported out-of-tree extensions. > > I don't think this is a real hurdle to general adoption of a language. > After all, Java and C# aren't intended to be used like that, yet they > certainly have wide-spread adoption. On the contrary, that is exactly how C# is intended to be used. Most libraries used from F# are written in C# (and the same for most other .NET languages). -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists