Hi,

Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Hugo Ferreira <hmf@inescporto.pt> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
> 
> Here you reached a bug (fixed for 3.10)
> 
>>         List.iter (fun i -> print_endline i)
>>           [do { "1"; "f(X,Y)"; "g(X,Y)"; "4" }]
>>       }
>>     in
>>     ()
>>

So I take it that I either wait for 3.10 or circumvent this problem with 
  a non-revised syntax print.

> 
> The in revised 1; 2 is not a valid expression you need to add do { ...
> } thus by printing it in the revised syntax you see that was not what
> you want.
> BTW it was a bug in camlp4 to print [1; 2] where it was [(1; 2)].
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 

It has indeed.


Thank you,
Hugo Ferreira.