[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2007-03-09 (17:31) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Operator overloading |
On Friday 09 March 2007 16:40, Robert Fischer wrote: > Exactly. If I was just going for inference and brevity, I'd still be > coding in Perl. But this is about statically resolving overloads to get both performance and brevity. Perl doesn't have performance. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists