Le 20 mars 07 à 19:50, Jeffrey Loren Shaw a écrit :

> Please consider this suggestion for an improvement of how caml  
> handles lazy evaluation.

At a certain point there was this discussion [1], but I guess the  
subsequent proposal never materialized because of tricky issues.

Daniel

[1] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/ 
2004/07/2461a873d5d45c22fef8816d4fe08d6b.fr.html